Bournville Village Trust

76.7% of Bournville Village Trust tenants are satisfied with the overall service (Tenant Satisfaction Measures 2024/25), above the England median of 71.8%. Bournville Village Trust tenants can swap homes with other social housing tenants through a mutual exchange, with Bournville Village Trust's permission.

3,446 homes, mostly in Birmingham and Telford and Wrekin. Registered social landlord no. L0702. On this page: what their tenants say, how they handle complaints, the regulator's grades, how many homes they own and where, typical rents and how to swap your home.

Size, areas and typical rents

Bournville Village Trust owns about 3,446 social homes across 2 council areas (2025/26).

Our place guides in each council area: what it's like to live there.

Typical weekly rents

Average housing association rents in the areas this landlord works in, weighted by where its homes are, 2025/26. Your own rent depends on the exact home.

SizeSocial rentAffordable rent
Bedsit£86£144
1 bed£99£129
2 bed£115£149
3 bed£127£166
4 bed£142£191

The regulator's verdict

The Regulator of Social Housing grades landlords on how well they look after tenants (consumer standards, C1 best to C4 worst) and, for housing associations, on governance (G) and financial viability (V).

C1 Consumer standards meets the consumer standards · Sep 2025
G1 Governance well governed · Sep 2025
V2 Financial viability financially viable but with risks to manage · Sep 2025

Councils are graded on consumer standards only. A grade is a snapshot at the date shown; the regulator publishes updates as it inspects.

Homes to swap from Bournville Village Trust tenants

No Bournville Village Trust tenants have listed a home yet. Are you one? List your home and it will appear here.

Tenant Ratings On Mutual Home Exchange

No tenant ratings yet.

Rent from Bournville Village Trust? Rate and review them

What tenants say

From the regulator's Tenant Satisfaction Measures survey, 2024/25, based on 843 tenant responses. Each figure is the share of tenants who said they were satisfied.

Ranked 122nd of 350 landlords in England for overall tenant satisfaction. See the league table · Compare it on every measure

Satisfied with the overall service 76.7% better than the sector median of 71.8%
Satisfied with repairs 77.2% better than the sector median of 73.6%
Satisfied with time taken for repairs 73.2% better than the sector median of 69.5%
Home is well maintained 77.8% better than the sector median of 71.9%
Home is safe 77.5% about the sector median (77.6%)
Landlord listens and acts 60.8% about the sector median (61.6%)
Kept informed 75.9% better than the sector median of 72.0%
Treated fairly and with respect 78.3% about the sector median (77.9%)
Satisfied with complaints handling 30.8% worse than the sector median of 35.5%
Communal areas clean and well maintained 69.2% better than the sector median of 66.7%
Positive contribution to the neighbourhood 71.5% better than the sector median of 64.6%
Satisfied with handling of anti-social behaviour 59% about the sector median (59.5%)

The thin marker on each bar is the median across all landlords in the data set.

Repairs, safety and complaints

From the landlord's own records reported to the regulator for 2024/25.

100% Gas safety checks completed about the sector median (100.0%)
100% Fire risk assessments completed about the sector median (100.0%)
99.6% Asbestos surveys completed about the sector median (100.0%)
100% Legionella risk assessments completed about the sector median (100.0%)
100% Lift safety checks completed about the sector median (100.0%)
0% Homes NOT meeting the Decent Homes Standard about the sector median (0.5%)
63.6% Non-emergency repairs done on time worse than the sector median of 82.5%
99.1% Emergency repairs done on time better than the sector median of 94.9%
59.5 Stage 1 complaints per 1,000 homes worse than the sector median of 53.9
96.3% Stage 1 complaints answered on time better than the sector median of 89.9
7.8 Stage 2 complaints per 1,000 homes about the sector median (8.4%)
85.7% Stage 2 complaints answered on time worse than the sector median of 88.9
28.7 Anti-social behaviour cases per 1,000 homes better than the sector median of 36.0

Repair targets: 35 12

Housing Ombudsman decisions

The Housing Ombudsman has published 4 decisions about Bournville Village Trust in its searchable archive.

2maladministration
1partial maladministration
1no maladministration
  • Managing Relations (202333028) Maladministration Nov 2024

    The complaint is about the landlord\u2019s response to the resident\u2019s reports of: Water penetration into her kitchen. Damage caused by: Tree roots. A leak from a radiator. The Ombudsman has also investigated the landlord\u2019s compl

  • Moving/Buying/Selling Home (202125427) No Maladministration Aug 2022

    The complaint is about the landlord\u2019s handling of the resident\u2019s rehousing application and its response to her concerns about its allocation process.

  • Financial (202014113) Maladministration Dec 2021

    The complaint is about the landlord's application of payments made by the resident for a purpose she did not intend.

  • Managing Relations (202100005) Partial Maladministration

    The complaint is about the landlord\u2019s: response to the resident\u2019s reports of a leak in her bathroom; response to the resident\u2019s request that it refund the cost of her emergency builder; communication following the resident's

Source: the Housing Ombudsman decisions archive, checked 14 Oct 2026. To see every case, search the archive for "Bournville Village Trust". Most landlords have some upheld complaints; compare the numbers with the landlord's size.

Swapping with a tenant of Bournville Village Trust?

Both landlords have to approve a mutual exchange, and both have 42 days to decide. They can only refuse on the grounds set out in the Housing Act 1985. Get the application in early, keep your rent account clear, and ask for the decision in writing.

Latest From @HomeExchangeGB

Follow @HomeExchangeGB for new homes

Page last updated:

Sources

Our editorial standards · Review policy · Report a mistake